In What Era Did Land (Terrestrial) Plants And Animals First Appear?

Volume 4 Supplement 3

Special Issue: Fabric Cultural Evolution

Original Scientific Article
Open Access
Published: 24 August 2011

Early Terrestrial Animals, Evolution, and Uncertainty

Evolution: Education and Outreach volume 4,pages 489–501 (2011)Cite this article

21k Accesses
10 Citations
19 Altmetric
Metrics details

Abstract

Early terrestrial ecosystems record a fascinating transition in the history of life. Animals and plants had previously lived only in the oceans, just, starting approximately 470 one thousand thousand years ago, began to colonize the previously arid continents. This newspaper provides an introduction to this flow in life's history, first presenting groundwork information, earlier focusing on 1 creature group, the arthropods. It gives examples of the organisms living in early on terrestrial communities and then outlines a suite of adaptations necessary for survival in harsh terrestrial environments. Emphasis is placed on the role of uncertainty in science; this is an integral part of the scientific process, yet is often seized upon by god-of-the-gaps creationist arguments. We hope to illustrate the importance of both doubtfulness and scientists' freedom to express doubt while a consensus is existence built.

Introduction

The impetus for this paper comes from a media report on the research of Garwood et al. (2009). The slice in question—in 1 of the more than widely circulated but less universally respected newspapers of the UK—outlined the 3-dimensional reconstruction of Carboniferous arachnids. Though the reporting was for the almost part scientifically accurate, the associated online comments department provided unfortunate dissimilarity. The first entry was a typically niggling and superficial anti-evolutionist'due south jibe regarding these arachnids: "they look simply like spiders practise today. 300 1000000 years and no change. […] Kind of hard on the old development theory isn't it?" When the comment'southward writer was asked to expand on his beliefs, the response was an entirely predictable: "Why do I accept to come upwards with an alternative for your useless theory?"

This altercation encapsulates perfectly a mutual creationist mindset, 1 based on brief (and often incorrect) observations coupled with complete ignorance (or at best patchy understanding) of the scientific context framing an argument. Come across, for example, the myriad arguments introduced in Role Iii of Scott (2009). Information technology further relies upon a god-of-the-gaps argument, the belief that in the instance of unanswered questions the proponent's personal worldview wins by default. No alternatives nor evidence supporting the proponent's perspective are required (Pennock 2007). The annotate is flawed on a number of counts. Not least, the arachnid group in question, the trigonotarbids (Fig. 1), were indeed quite different from spiders in that they lacked the ability to spin silk (Shear 2000a) and possessed a segmented posterior torso region (likely inherited from their terminal shared common ancestor with spiders; Dunlop 1997). Furthermore, equally we shall see later in this article, a degree of morphological stasis over 300 million years is in no way antithetical to the theory of evolution. The comment is also unfortunate considering the early terrestrial (country-based) creature communities in which this trigonotarbid lived provide us with resounding evidence for evolution. They likewise offering an excellent example of the unanswered questions and uncertainties inherent to—and a driving force in—scientific inquiry. It is these uncertainties that the arguments of antievolutionists seize upon. If they succeeded, this would stifle the colorful world of scientific discovery and reduce information technology to a Manichaen palette of unquestioning certainty and unknowable unknowns (the dualism of Nelson 1999).

With this in listen, nosotros hope that this newspaper will not but introduce these fossil communities and outline their development, but also demonstrate that ambiguity in science is neither detrimental nor a weakness. Rather it is a vital part of our field, which stimulates contend and drives further research and discoveries.

The paper is carve up into sections—the adjacent will introduce terrestrial life as a whole during this menstruation in the Earth's history before nosotros focus on one group of animals in particular, the arthropods. We volition then innovate examples of early terrestrial fossils that run the gamut from entirely extinct groups to those that are largely unchanged compared to their mod relatives, living in ecosystems that closely resemble those today. Nosotros will finish by introducing some of the adaptations these animals have evolved for a life on country.

Terrestrial Palaeozoic Life

The Paleozoic Era lasts from the get-go of the Cambrian Period (542 meg years ago; Gradstein et al. 2009), known for its famous explosion of marine animals, to the finish of the Permian Period (251 one thousand thousand years agone); marked by the greatest mass extinction ever known (Sahney and Benton 2008). Prior to the Paleozoic, the but life on land was unicellular, a fact that—until recently—could only be inferred from indirect evidence (Rasmussen et al. 2009; Prave 2002). Nonetheless, current research is revealing unexpectedly diverse terrestrial communities revealed in one billion-year-old cellular fossils (Strother et al. 2011). Information technology was during the Paleozoic Era that plants (first known from microfossils called cryptospores that announced in the mid-Ordovician, almost 470 million years ago; Wellman and Grayness 2000) and animals (known from Silurian fossils, at least 423 1000000 years agone; Wilson and Anderson 2004) began to colonize the land. Land plants started as small, not-vascular mosses and liverworts (bryophytes; Edwards 2000), but by the Tardily Silurian, simple plants with axial organization and terminal sporangia (spore-bearing structures) were becoming mutual (e.g., Cooksonia; Kenrick and Crane 1997). During the Tardily Paleozoic—the Devonian (416–359 meg years agone) and Carboniferous (359–299 1000000 years agone) periods—the get-go widespread forest ecosystems became established (DiMichele et al. 2007). Although quite dissimilar from modernistic forests, past the Carboniferous, these were various (DiMichele 2001) and included early on tree-similar relatives of extant club mosses (lycopsids) and horsetails (Calamites), and a wide variety of ferns (Falcon-Lang and Miller 2007). These forests were home to a wide range of animals, which had first ventured on to land in the preceding 100 million years. Ane group of these were early ancestors of all terrestrial vertebrates, which had offset ventured on to land during the Devonian (probably between 385 and 360 million years ago). Paleozoic fossils tape this transition from fish to land-dwelling house limbed organisms (tetrapods; Clack 2009) and too span the dissever between true amphibians and other vertebrates (mammals and reptiles/birds; Clack 2006; Coates et al. 2008). Many early tetrapods were however aquatic, and probably lived within rivers and other freshwater environments, with the possible occasional foray onto country (Benton 2005). Fully terrestrial species were common by the Carboniferous Period, even so, and the earliest truthful reptiles had evolved by the end of the Paleozoic, in the form of small- to medium-sized insect eaters (Modesto et al. 2009).

The majority of animate being diversity and abundance in Paleozoic terrestrial communities tin can be found in the arthropods (a group which has, in fact, been dominant in terms of animal species diverseness for all of the past 520 million years; Edgecombe 2010). The phylum Arthropoda is a group of animals united by, amid other traits: external and internal trunk sectionalisation with regional specialization (tagmosis, e.g., a thorax with legs and wings versus a limbless abdomen in the instance of insects); an exoskeleton composed of articulated plates, hardened through calcification or sclerotization (poly peptide cross-linking); torso segments that primitively bear paired, articulated appendages; growth via molting (ecdysis); a pair of lateral facetted (chemical compound) eyes that are innervated past the first of iii segments that comprise the brain; and an open circulatory system featuring a dorsal center with lateral valves (Grimaldi and Engel 2005). The unique features of arthropods betoken that they are a monophyletic group (descendants of a mutual ancestor that possessed the diagnostic features of the group). Arthropoda (Fig. two) includes the extinct trilobites, the insects, the myriapods (millipedes, centipedes, and relatives), the crustaceans (e.grand., crabs, lobsters, shrimp), and the chelicerates (arachnids, such as spiders, scorpions and mites, and horseshoe crabs). Their abundance makes arthropods ecologically vital; for example, myriapods are of import processors of leaf litter in forests, and termites consume large quantities of cellulose (Crawford 1992; Higashi et al. 1992). Without arthropods, the life and ecosystems of the Earth would exist radically different. Their phenomenal variety (constituting in excess of 75% of all described living species; Brusca and Brusca 2003) can help elucidate the patterns and processes of evolution. For case, the report of trilobites was central to the development of punctuated equilibrium as a model for evolutionary change (Eldredge and Gould 1972; Gould and Eldredge 1977), and the fruit fly Drosophila was the "model organism" used in much of the pioneering work on genetics in the early on twentieth century likewise equally unraveling the genetics of evolution in the late twentieth century. Information technology is for these reasons that the post-obit give-and-take of terrestrial Paleozoic life and evolution will focus on the Arthopoda.

The Palaeozoic Fossil Tape of Terrestrial Arthropods

The first terrestrial arthropods predated tetrapods by tens of millions of years (Shear and Selden 2001). Testify of animal life on land earlier the first known arthropod body fossils can exist found in the form of preserved traces that are probable to have been created past macroscopic organisms. Identifying the brute that made trackways or burrows is not always straightforward. For example, burrows assigned to the ichnogenus Scoyenia from Late Ordovician (ca 447 one thousand thousand years ago) rocks in Pennsylvania (Retallack and Feakes 1987) had been interpreted as having been made by millipedes (Retallack 2001), merely this has been disputed based on how living millipedes burrow (Wilson 2006) and besides because the sediments evidence prove of a marine rather than terrestrial origin (Davies et al. 2010). The all-time candidates for trackways of Ordovician historic period that were made by an identifiable group of terrestrial arthropods occur in Late Ordovician rocks in Cumbria, United kingdom of great britain and northern ireland, in ash and sandstones that were deposited subaerially (Johnson et al. 1994). A comparison with the locomotory traces of living "pin cushion" millipedes showed that the stepping gait of the Cumbrian Ordovician trackways is consistent with them having been made by an early millipede (Wilson 2006).

The offset body fossil bear witness of the animals responsible for such tracks dates from the Silurian Period (444–416 one thousand thousand years ago). Several millipedes accept recently come up to low-cal from Stonehaven, UK (approximately 423 million years agone), including one species, Pneumodesmus newmanii, that provides the first evidence for air breathing in any form of animate being (Wilson and Anderson 2004). This can exist seen in spiracles (or, more than biblically, stigmata)—openings into the tracheal (breathing) system which are a terrestrial characteristic by definition. Another of the Silurian millipedes has a paired construction on the anterior function of the trunk, in the usual segmental position and with a characteristic course of a gonopod, a modified pair of legs that male millipedes use to transfer sperm to the female'southward genital opening (Fig. 3; Wilson and Anderson 2004). The Silurian fossils thus provide direct evidence for a similar reproductive mode as their extant relatives.

The majority of fossils from effectually this time, however, are not discovered by simply splitting rocks in the field, just rather are institute in acid macerate residues. These are "leftovers" from the acid digestion of rocks, to which the arthropod cuticle (exoskeleton), equanimous of chitin, is resistant. The earliest deposit from which this technique has recovered identifiable organisms is found in Ludford Lane, Shropshire, UK (approximately 417 1000000 years agone) where both arachnids and centipedes are known (Jeram et al. 1990). A wider range of arthropods are recovered using this method from Middle Devonian (388 million years ago) rocks of Gilboa, New York. These include a number of different arachnids, including mites and pseudoscorpions (Shear et al. 1987; Norton et al. 1988; Schawaller et al. 1991; Selden et al. 1991), centipedes (Shear and Bonamo 1988), and possible fragments of insect exoskeleton (Shear et al. 1984).

Another famous Devonian (approximately 396 1000000 years ago on the basis of radiometric dating, though spores suggest a slightly older age in the Early Devonian; Rice et al. 1995; Wellman et al. 2006) fossil locality is the Rhynie Chert, near Aberdeen, in Scotland. These translucent rocks were formed in a hydrothermal hot spring setting in which silica-rich water inundated and silicified nearby vegetation, including a number of the animals—all arthropods—creating a nearly-perfect record of this early on terrestrial ecosystem (Trewin et al. 2003). The incredibly well-preserved fossils are studied in slides made from the rock and often display the internal anatomy (due east.k., volume lungs, the respiratory organs of arachnids; Kamenz et al. 2008). Animals described to engagement include arachnids (Fayers et al. 2005), primitively flightless hexapods (springtails and a bristletail or silverfish), as well as truthful insects (Fayers and Trewin 2005; Engel and Grimaldi 2004), centipedes (Shear et al. 1998), and freshwater Crustacea, including extinct relatives of fairy shrimp and tadpole shrimp (Trewin and Fayers 2007). Another fossil locality from the Early Devonian is Germany's Alken-an-der-Mosel, from which a range of different arthropods, including several kinds of arachnids and relatives of millipedes called eoarthropleurids, were described by the Norwegian paleontologist Leif Størmer (1970; 1972; 1973; 1974; 1976), but few other deposits preserve anything more than isolated individuals. Despite the important anatomical, ecological, and temporal data provided by the Silurian and Devonian fossil deposits, the first widespread and well-preserved record of terrestrial ecosystems dates from approximately 20 1000000 years later, in deposits of the Upper Carboniferous Flow (Shear 2000b). During this period, a mountain-building event, the Variscan Orogeny, contributed to the assembly of the supercontinent Pangea (Cocks and Torsvik 2006). Despite glaciations at the poles, a wide zone carpeted with thick forests and vegetation spanned the tropics and even some higher latitudes (Cleal and Thomas 2005). These forests supported diverse ecosystems (Shear and Kukalová-Peck 1990). Many of them were in effect mires, wet environments in which organic matter accumulates (DiMichele 2001), and flooding was widespread (Falcon-Lang 2000; Plotnick et al. 2009). The resulting waterlogged boggy sediments create platonic conditions for the preservation of fossils within siderite (FeCO_three) nodules and besides for the germination of coal (Curtis and Coleman 1986). Every bit a upshot, coal from this period is found throughout North America and Europe. In fact, the Carboniferous was responsible for fuelling the industrial revolution on both continents (Chandler Jr 1972; Hartwell 1967). Thus, a number of factors created ideal weather for both the widespread preservation of fossils during the Carboniferous and the exploitation of these deposits by geologists more than 300 million years later. Equally a result, they provide ane of the virtually of import windows into early terrestrial ecosystems.

Evolutionary Relationships

Fossils from these early ecosystems record a number of arthropod groups at different grades of organisation, which we will briefly compare hither. Some are entirely extinct groups, such as the same arachnids, the trigonotarbids (Fig. 4a; Dunlop et al. 2008a). These are known from exceptionally well-preserved Rhynie Chert fossils and appear to have been among the virtually abundant arachnids in Carboniferous coal forests (Garwood and Dunlop 2011). The presence of two pairs of lungs on the same body segments as some extant forms provides a strong argument that they are virtually closely related to a group known as the tetrapulmonate arachnids, which includes the spiders, whip scorpions, whip spiders, and brusque-tailed whipscorpions (Dunlop 2010). Indeed, the fine structure of the book lungs from a Devonian trigonotarbid, examined using three-dimensional reconstruction techniques, is shared with living tetrapulmonates (Kamenz et al. 2008). The youngest fossil member of the group dates from 290 million years agone (Rößler et al. 2003). Thus, the trigonotarbids are an entirely extinct group, an evolutionary dead end, but one that shares a common antecedent with spiders and other arachnids with ii pairs of lungs.

The earliest centipedes exhibit features that let them to be classified in some of the major groups that take survived until today. The oldest of these, from the Late Silurian of the Welsh Borderlands in England, belong to a genus, Crussolum, that is better known from various body parts in the Early and Middle Devonian (equally for many examples in this article, the Devonian fossils come from the Rhynie cherts in Scotland and Gilboa in New York Country—Fig. 4b has an example; Anderson and Trewin 2003; Shear and Bonamo 1988). Crussolum is unambiguously a member of Scutigeromorpha, a group that includes 100 living species that mostly live in the tropics and subtropics, merely best known from the "house centipede," Scutigera coleoptrata, an introduced species in many temperate parts of the earth (Fig. 2c). Crussolum shares with the extant scutigeromorphs such features as a pentagonal cross-department of the leg with each of the ridges that runs along the leg segments begetting a file of spines and thickened setae, only it lacks a few details that all of the living scutigeromorphs share with each other. For example, though the fossils have the commencement pair of trunk legs modified into a functional part of the caput (and housing the venom apparatus in all living centipedes), they do non have long "spine bristles" in fixed positions that are seen in all the living species. This mix of primitive and avant-garde characters in Crussolum is described using a convention chosen "stem groups"; Crussolum belongs to the stem group of Scutigeromorpha. This means that the species is more closely related to Scutigeromorpha than to any other living centipede grouping, but it branched earlier than the almost recent common antecedent of all living scutigeromorph species.

Amongst the earliest winged insects—and very common in the Carboniferous—were the Blattoptera, or "roachoids" (Fig. 4d). Every bit the proper noun suggests, these were similar to modern-twenty-four hours cockroaches. For example, they possessed hardened, protective forewings and a pronotum (a head shield originating at the first segment of the thorax), simply dissimilar true cockroaches, they had a long needle-like ovipositor for laying eggs (Grimaldi and Engel 2005). The reason they are known equally "roachoid" fossils is because—while they are superficially like to cockroaches in advent—they predate the divide between the mantises and the cockroaches and termites (the termites are actually highly derived, eusocial cockroaches; Inwards et al. 2007). Equally such, these weren't an evolutionary expressionless stop; collectively, "roachoids" represent a grade at the base of the evolutionary tree for Dictyoptera, the formal name for the mantises (and cockroaches + termites), making them another example of a stem group course. It is likely that some of the later Carboniferous fossils postdate the evolutionary divergence of the extant lineages of Dictyoptera, and they would appropriately belong to the stalk groups of either the mantises or the cockroach/termite branch (Béthoux et al. 2009).

Scorpions are the earliest known arachnids and have a significant Paleozoic fossil record (Fig. 4e; Dunlop et al. 2008b). While fence remains regarding whether their earliest representatives were aquatic or terrestrial (Dunlop and Webster 1999; Kamenz et al. 2008), by the Carboniferous, there is little question the scorpions were land-dwelling (Jeram 1994a). Even by the Early Devonian, fragments of the volume lungs of fossil scorpions indicate air breathing (Shear et al. 1996). All modern scorpions belong to a group known as the orthosterns, which possess spiracles within the plates on the scorpions' underside rather than at their margin as seen in some of the oldest fossil species. The oldest members of this group are Carboniferous in age (Fig. 4e; Vogel and Durden 1966; Jeram 1994b; Legg et al. 2011), and the oldest known member of an extant family unit is at least 50 million years younger (Lourenço and Gall 2004). Thus, afterwards Paleozoic scorpions probably fall in the stalk group of modernistic families, just postdate the last common ancestor of the orthosternous scorpions. We can hence say that the origin of extant scorpions lies in the Carboniferous Menstruum.

Peradventure some of the most impressive terrestrial Paleozoic fossils, however, are those of harvestmen (Fig. 4c): arachnids of the order Opiliones, which have a pocket-sized fused body and often extremely long legs (Machado et al. 2007). The best fossils are once again those of the Rhynie cherts, which preserve the internal beefcake, including specimens that have the reproductive organs of either males or females (Dunlop et al. 2003). Their morphology suggests that they are essentially modern in form. The fact that the Devonian species was placed in ane of the four major living groups of Opiliones (Dunlop et al. 2004) implies that harvestmen were amongst the earliest branching arachnids and corroborates recent molecular work suggesting a relatively early on Paleozoic radiation in the group (Giribet et al. 2010). Furthermore, the fact that they accept remained morphologically largely unchanged for over 400 million years suggests that they exemplify evolutionary stasis. Why this is the case remains unclear, but this uncertainty regarding the cause of stasis in no way undermines evolution equally a god-of-the-gaps proponent would suggest. Stasis within species is expected in a number of evolutionary models (Eldredge and Gould 1972; Sheldon 1996; Benton and Pearson 2001). Thus, in higher-level taxonomic groups with relatively low rates of speciation, we may expect elements of stasis (see give-and-take: Gould 2002, p. 936; Cavalier-Smith 2006, p. 999; and stasis in ecological assemblages: DiMichele et al. 2004). Information technology is noteworthy, however, that stasis in taxonomic groups above the species level is the exception rather than the rule, as the above examples demonstrate. The fact that such stasis exists presents us with a compelling opportunity to explain its presence—it does non allow a not-naturalistic view to win by default.

Terrestrial Adaptations

Only nine of 58 extinct and extant beast phyla have terrestrial representatives (Labandeira and Beall 1990), largely because country presents a new and hostile surround for a marine organism (Selden and Jeram 1989; Selden and Edwards 1990). Every bit a result, life on state requires a suite of adaptations. The presence of such changes to accommodate a new mode of life provides excellent evidence for development; they have a clear functional significance, and a number have evolved separately in different lineages (Raven 1985). To reiterate, the earliest known terrestrial animals were arthropods (Petty 1983)—members of the Myriapoda (millipedes, centipedes, and their kin), Arachnida (spiders, scorpions, and relatives), and Hexapoda (insects and three smaller, primitively wingless groups). In this, the final section of the paper, we shall provide an overview of the adaptations present in terrestrial arthropod groups and then outline why their convergent development (independent origins in different lineages) has sometimes complicated efforts to appraise arthropod relationships (Edgecombe 2010).

H2o Loss

Of the problems associated with terrestrial life, peradventure the biggest is that of water retention (Hadley 1994). Water is a vital solvent for life, and minimizing h2o loss and ensuring its availability is vital for terrestrial organisms (Little 1983). A major part of the fight to avoid desiccation is the arthropods' exoskeleton, the outermost layer of which (the epicuticle) is waxy and waterproof (Fig. 5a; Cody et al. 2011). This proofing is caused by lipids (hydrocarbons, in this instance including alkane series-like molecules, wax esters, fatty acids, and ketones) both within the epicuticle and deposited on its surface (Hadley 1986). Every bit well every bit waterproofing an organism, this very successfully prevents evaporation. Equally we shall see below, terrestrial arthropods employ a variety of independently derived respiratory systems. Despite these contained origins, all are internal, an arrangement which serves to lessen water loss (Brusca and Brusca 2003). Additionally, all possess spiracles (Fig. 5b)—the structures that provide the primeval evidence for fully terrestrial life in millipedes. Spiracles act as an opening through the cuticle into respiratory structures, and—despite independent origins—those of insects (Gullan and Cranston 2010), myriapods (Shear and Edgecombe 2010), and chelicerates (Levi 1967) have associated musculature to regulate gas entry and exit, and minimize h2o loss through the moist respiratory structures. This is even the example where the respiratory organs—introduced below—differ greatly, for example, between the book lungs of scorpions (Polis 1990) and the tracheal system of insects (Grimaldi and Engel 2005).

Another major source of water loss in organisms is excretion. When animals digest protein, backlog nitrogen is produced and is usually liberated in the class of ammonia (NH₃), a toxic compound that requires rapid dilution or removal (Brusca and Brusca 2003). Dilution demands abundant water and is thus unsuitable for terrestrial organisms, for whom water is a precious resource. Thus, almost terrestrial organisms convert ammonia into more complex yet less toxic compounds; in vertebrates, like us, urea, simply in arthropods uric acid is more common, which is often precipitated in solid form (Raven 1985). In arthropods, this waste material is removed with the aid of two types of organs.

Nephridia are organs constitute on one or a few anterior body segments of all arthropod groups. The closest living relatives of arthropods, the velvet worms (Onychophora), have a pair of nephridia on nearly body segments, and they resemble those of many aquatic animals (Fig. 6a) in beingness composed of an excretory duct starting at the beast's exterior (opening to a pore at the inner base of each leg in velvet worms) and catastrophe with a funnel-shaped, hair-lined opening into the torso. The hairs straight fluid into the duct (Ruppert et al. 2003). As this moves through, the reabsorption and secretion of cells lining the duct alter the liquid, concentrating waste matter products (Ruppert and Smith 1988; Campiglia and Maddrell 1986; Bartolomaeus 1992). Waste matter is excreted to the outside through the concluding opening, known as the nephridopore. Nephridia of arthropods, in the course of coxal glands, antennal glands, maxillary glands, or labial kidneys (depending on where they are located), differ in being internally closed and the funnel is non ciliated. Nephridial organs are thought to have been present in the terminal mutual antecedent of all arthropods (known equally a plesiomorphic trait).

Most terrestrial arthropods also possess or wholly replace nephridia with structures known every bit Malpighian tubules, which allow efficient waste material removal. These are bullheaded ducts which open at one finish into the gut and remain unattached at the other finish (Fig. 6b). They float and motility effectually in arthropods' blood-filled body crenel (or hemocoel) and absorb waste product products. As the waste moves down the tubule, water is reabsorbed, until crystals of uric acrid are formed, and in the hindgut, further reabsorption occurs in a structure known as the rectal gland (Roberts 1986). The in a higher place clarification is based upon the Malpighian tubules of insects, and each individual can have hundreds of these (Brusca and Brusca 2003). However, very like structures have been independently derived in both myriapods, which take only i or two depending on the group (Hopkin and Read 1992; Lewis 2007), and terrestrial chelicerates, which have several branching tubules (Barnes et al. 2001). Water loss can farther be reduced through behavior—arthropods at take a chance of desiccation will often alive in humid and moist environments to the extent that some extract moisture from the substrate (Crawford and Cloudsley-Thompson 1971). Many desert-dwelling species avoid periods of loftier temperatures by becoming inactive in burrows (Hadley 1974).

Gas Exchange

Another major issue with life on land is that of respiration, or gas substitution (Raven 1985). This cannot be done through increasing the permeability of the exoskeleton, which would allow significant water loss. As we accept seen, this is a significant consideration, and all but the smallest terrestrial arthropods have specialized gas exchange structures (Selden and Edwards 1990). These come in 2 flavors. The starting time—plant in arachnids—are the book lungs: stacked, claret-filled lamellae extending into an air-filled cavity (Fig. 7a). This cavity (the atrium) opens to the outside through the spiracles (Scholtz and Kamenz 2006), and the thin lamellae provide a high surface surface area to permit gas commutation. The second type of respiratory structures, which probably evolved convergently in insects and myriapods (Grimaldi 2010), are known as tracheae (Fig. 7b). These are branching cuticle-lined tubules opening externally through the spiracles and terminating internally in the blood, or organ tissues (Barnes et al. 2001). This is an efficient system, assuasive direct gas substitution with the internal organs and blood—so much so that a similar system has secondarily evolved from volume lungs in some spiders (Schmitz and Perry 2001). Comparable structures chosen pseudotrachea are besides found in woodlice, which are crustaceans of the lodge Isopoda (Edney 1968).

Reproduction

A less immediately apparent effect is that of reproduction—for arthropods in the marine realm, releasing eggs and sperm into the sea for external fertilization is a viable arroyo for reproduction (Selden and Jeram 1989). This is not as effective in the terrestrial realm, however, and internal fertilization is usually preferred. Associated with this is a broad range of complex sperm transfer techniques—for example, the employ of packages of sperm known as spermatophores is common, protecting them (to an extent) from the harsh terrestrial surround. A bewilderingly vast array of sometimes complex courtship behaviors has developed in terrestrial arthropods (Choe and Crespi 1997). While there are myriad possible causes for this adaptation (Bastock 2007), in part this could exist to ensure the successful transfer of spermatophores (for example, in the whip spiders, Fig. 2a; Weygoldt 2002). Direct sperm transfer in the form of copulation bypasses the risk of ecology damage in many more derived forms (Selden and Edwards 1990). Young are frequently helped with parental heart-searching during embryonic evolution or later birth (Labandeira and Beall 1990).

Locomotion and Senses

While life on state presents a plethora of other challenges, the last we will look at hither stem from the physical differences betwixt water and air. These can take a significant impact on an organism's morphology, given that h2o has greater buoyancy than air (Selden and Jeram 1989). To back up themselves, terrestrial organisms crave rigid skeletal elements, and the arthropods had a preexisting advantage in their presence of an exoskeleton (Raven 1985). Terrestrial arthropods also generally prefer a more stable hanging stance, standing on the underside of their limbs whose ends are at a depression bending to the footing (a plantigrade tarsus; Størmer 1970; Fig. 8a). In that location are also a huge number of sensory adaptations to this new medium, for example, the trichobothria of scorpions (Fig. 8b)—long, thin hairs originating in a cup-shaped depression that tin sense very slight air vibrations (Reissland and Görner 1985). This aids prey location and orientation relative to wind, simply would non work in a fluid medium (Krapf 1986; Meßlinger 1987). Superficially similar trichobothria are also nowadays in some myriapods (Haupt 1979); the afar relationship betwixt these myriapods and arachnids indicates a convergent evolution of trichobothria.

Equally a upshot of this suite of adaptations—and a host of further physiological changes—arthropods are successful terrestrial organisms. And so successful, in fact, that whether judged by number of species or individuals, they are thriving desert inhabitants (Edney 1967) and are vital members of these harshest terrestrial ecosystems (Whitford 2000).

Dubiety

All of these evolutionary adaptations increment fitness in terrestrial environments, and as such, their parallel (convergent) evolution in multiple lineages nether the aforementioned selective force per unit area is expected. However, they too effectively demonstrate a major cause of uncertainty amongst arthropod workers—the traditional basis for assessing evolutionary relationships is morphology (Darwin 1859; Skelton 1993). Thus, assessing whether structures are homologous (share a common origin) or homoplasious (the result of convergence) is vital to agreement a grouping's relationships (Edgecombe 2009). This is rarely clear-cut, yet. To use examples we have seen already, insects and myriapods share tracheae and Malphighian tubules, and these features were traditionally ascribed to inheritance from mutual beginnings considering insects and myriapods were considered sister taxa in a group known as the Atelocerata (Snodgrass 1938; Klass and Kristensen 2001; Bitsch and Bitsch 2004; see also discussion in Shultz and Regier 2000 and Dohle 1998). They farther share a suite of other characters, including single-branched appendages and a caput comprising an antennal segment, a limbless (intercalary) segment, and then 2 segments bearing mouthparts. However, Dna analysis has never supported this group, with many different kinds of genetic data all agreeing instead that the insects share a common antecedent with the crustaceans (insects and crustaceans collectively forming a group called the Tetraconata; Jenner 2010). This is now largely accepted and has been corroborated by many features of the encephalon, eyes, and nervous system development that are unique to insects and crustaceans simply not shared past myriapods (Edgecombe 2010). The evolutionary picture provided by the genes and nervous organisation suggests that tracheae and Malphighian tubules in insects and myriapods are an example of convergent development in two terrestrial lineages. Even so, the new consensus on an insect–crustacean relationship emerged from 20 years of research (including enormous technological and theoretical advances in molecular biology and new techniques of investigating anatomy) and through frank discussion of the opposing arguments.

This process of altering hypotheses on the footing of increased evidence is central to the science, notwithstanding such advances rely on uncertainty and debate. If god-of-the-gaps creationist opposition makes scientists reluctant to limited their doubts on a subject—such as the issue of arthropod relationships outlined hither—these advances would be slower-to-nonexistent. Due to the nature of development, ambiguity is ubiquitous; the outlined example of similarity as a event of either a common evolutionary origin or later convergence is simply 1 of many sources of debate. It is for this reason that myriad unanswered questions regarding arthropod phylogeny remain, some at a fairly basic level. To present unanswered questions equally a weakness, or pretend they undermine evidence, is disingenuous and incorrect. Rather, the possibility of new evidence, resulting in paradigm shifts and a greater understanding of the history of life, is one of the most exciting elements of scientific discipline.

References

Anderson LI, Trewin NH. An Early on Devonian arthropod fauna from the Windyfield Cherts, Aberdeenshire, Scotland. Palaeontology. 2003;46(3):467–509.

Google Scholar
Barnes RSK, Calow PP, Olive PJW, Golding DW, Spicer JI. The invertebrates: a synthesis. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell; 2001.

Google Scholar
Bartolomaeus T. Protonephridia and metanephridia—their relation within the Bilateria. J Zool Syst Evol Research 1992;xxx:21–45.

Google Scholar
Bastock M. Courtship: an ethological report. New Bailiwick of jersey: Transaction Publishers; 2007.

Google Scholar
Bong WJ, Adiyodi KG. The American cockroach. London: Chapman and Hall; 1982.

Google Scholar
Benton MJ. Vertebrate palaeontology: third edition. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing; 2005.

Google Scholar
Benton MJ, Pearson PN. Speciation in the fossil record. Trends Ecol Evol. 2001;xvi(7):405–11.

Google Scholar
Béthoux O, Klass KD, Schneider JW. Tackling the Protoblattoidea problem: revision of Protoblattinopsis stubblefieldi (Dictyoptera; Late Carboniferous). European J Entomol. 2009;106:145–52.

Google Scholar
Bitsch C, Bitsch J. Phylogenetic relationships of basal hexapods among the mandibulate arthropods: a cladistic analysis based on comparative morphological characters. Zool Scr. 2004;33(vi):511–50.

Google Scholar
Brusca RC, Brusca GJ. Invertebrates—second edition. Sunderland: Sinauer Associates; 2003.

Google Scholar
Campiglia SS, Maddrell SHP. Ion absorption by the distal tubules of onychophoran nephridia. J Exp Biol. 1986;121:43–54.

CAS Google Scholar
Cavalier-Smith T. Cell evolution and Earth history: stasis and revolution. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser B: Biol Sci. 2006;361(1470):969–1006.

CAS Google Scholar
Chandler Jr Ad. Anthracite coal and the ancestry of the Industrial Revolution in the United States. Bus Hist Rev. 1972;46(two):147–81.

Google Scholar
Choe JC, Crespi BJ. The development of mating systems in insects and arachnids. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1997.

Google Scholar
Ballyhoo JA. The emergence of early tetrapods. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol. 2006;232(2–4):167–89.

Google Scholar
Clack JA. The fin to limb transition: new information, interpretations, and hypotheses from paleontology and developmental biology. Annu Rev Earth Planet Sci. 2009;37(1):163–79.

CAS Google Scholar
Cleal CJ, Thomas BA. Palaeozoic tropical rainforests and their effect on global climates: is the past the key to the nowadays? Geobiology. 2005;three(1):13–31.

CAS Google Scholar
Coates MI, Ruta Chiliad, Friedman Yard. Ever since Owen: changing perspectives on the early development of tetrapods. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 2008;39:571–92.

Google Scholar
Cocks LRM, Torsvik TH. European geography in a global context from the Vendian to the end of the Palaeozoic. Geol Soc Lond, Memoirs. 2006;32(ane):83–95.

Google Scholar
Cody GD, Gupta NS, Briggs DEG, Kilcoyne ALD, Summons RE, Kenig F, et al. Molecular signature of chitin–protein complex in Paleozoic arthropods. Geology. 2011;39(3):255–viii.

CAS Google Scholar
Crawford CS. Millipedes every bit model detritivores. Berichte der Naturwissenschaftlich. 1992;10:277–88.

Google Scholar
Crawford CS, Cloudsley-Thompson JL. Water relations and desiccation-fugitive behavior in the vinegaroon Mastigoproctus giganteus (Arachnida: Uropygi). Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata. 1971;fourteen(1):99–106.

Google Scholar
Curtis CD, Coleman ML. On the precipitation of early on diagenetic calcite, dolomite and siderite concretions in circuitous depositional sequences. In: Gautier DL, editor. Roles of organic affair in sediment diagenesis. Guild of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists Special Publication 38; 1986. p. 23–33.
Darwin C. On the origin of species by means of natural pick, or the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life. London: John Murray; 1859.

Google Scholar
Davies NS, Rygel MC, Gibling MR. Marine influence in the Upper Ordovician Juniata Germination (Potters Mills, Pennsylvania): implications for the history of life on state. Palaios. 2010;25(viii):527–39.

Google Scholar
DiMichele WA. Affiliate 1.3.viii.—Carboniferous coal-swamp forests. In: Briggs DEG, Crowther PR, editors. Palaeobiology II. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell; 2001. p. 79–82.

Google Scholar
DiMichele WA, Behrensmeyer AK, Olszewski TD, Labandeira CC, Pandolfi JM, Wing SL, et al. Long-term stasis in ecological assemblages: testify from the fossil record. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 2004;35(i):285–322.

Google Scholar
DiMichele WA, Falcon-Lang HJ, John Nelson W, Elrick SD, Ames PR. Ecological gradients within a Pennsylvanian mire forest. Geology. 2007;35(5):415–viii.

Google Scholar
Dohle Westward. Myriapod-insect relationships as opposed to an insect–crustacean sister group human relationship. In: Fortey RA, Thomas RH, editors. Arthropod relationships. London: Chapman & Hall; 1998. p. 305–fifteen.

Google Scholar
Dunlop JA. The origins of tetrapulmonate book lungs and their significance for chelicerate phylogeny. In: Selden PA, editor. Proceedings of the 17th European Colloquium of Arachnology, Edinburgh 1997. Burnham Beeches: British Arachnological Society; 1997. p. 9–16.

Google Scholar
Dunlop JA. Geological history and phylogeny of Chelicerata. Arthropod Struct Dev. 2010;39(2–three):124–42.

Google Scholar
Dunlop JA, Webster Chiliad. Fossil evidence, terrestrialization and arachnid phylogeny. J Arachnol. 1999;27(one):86–93.

Google Scholar
Dunlop JA, Anderson LI, Kerp H, Hass H. Preserved organs of Devonian harvestmen. Nature. 2003;425:916.

CAS Google Scholar
Dunlop JA, Anderson LI, Kerp H, Hass H. A harvestman (Arachnida: Opiliones) from the Early Devonian Rhynie cherts, Aberdeenshire, Scotland. Trans Majestic Soc Edinburgh, Globe Sci. 2004;94(4):341–54.

Google Scholar
Dunlop JA, Tetlie OE, Penney D, Anderson LI. How many species of fossil arachnids are there? J Arachnol. 2008a;36(2):267–72.

Google Scholar
Dunlop JA, Tetlie OE, Prendini 50. Reinterpretation of the Silurian scorpion Proscorpius osborni (Whitfield): integrating information from Palaeozoic and recent scorpions. Palaeontology. 2008b;51(2):303–20.

Google Scholar
Edgecombe GD. Palaeontological and molecular prove linking arthropods, onychophorans, and other Ecdysozoa. Evol: Educ Outreach. 2009;two(2):178–90.

Google Scholar
Edgecombe GD. Arthropod phylogeny: an overview from the perspectives of morphology, molecular data and the fossil record. Arthropod Struct Dev. 2010;39:74–87.

Google Scholar
Edney EB. H2o residual in desert arthropods. Science. 1967;156(3778):1059–66.

CAS Google Scholar
Edney EB. Transition from water to land in isopod crustaceans. Amer Zool. 1968;viii(3):309–26.

Google Scholar
Edwards D. The role of mid-Palaeozoic mesofossils in the detection of early bryophytes. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser B: Biol Sci. 2000;355:733–54.

CAS Google Scholar
Eldredge N, Gould SJ. Punctuated equilibria: an alternative to phyletic gradualism. In: Schopf TJ, editor. Models in paleobiology. San Francisco: Freeman, Cooper & Co.; 1972. p. 82–115.

Google Scholar
Engel MS, Grimaldi DA. New light shed on the oldest insect. Nature. 2004;427:627–30.

CAS Google Scholar
Falcon-Lang HJ. Burn down environmental of the Carboniferous tropical zone. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol. 2000;164:339–55.

Google Scholar
Falcon-Lang HJ, Miller RF. Palaeoenvironments and palaeoecology of the Early Pennsylvanian Lancaster Germination ('Fern Ledges') of Saint John, New Brunswick, Canada. J Geol Soc Lond. 2007;164(v):945–57.

Google Scholar
Fayers SR, Trewin NH. A hexapod from the Early Devonian Windyfield chert, Rhynie, Scotland. Palaeontology. 2005;48(5):1117–30.

Google Scholar
Fayers SR, Dunlop JA, Trewin NH. A new Early Devonian trigonotarbid arachnid from the Windyfield Chert, Rhynie, Scotland. J Syst Palaeontol. 2005;2(4):269–84.

Google Scholar
Garwood RJ, Dunlop JA. Morphology and systematics of Anthracomartidae (Arachnida: Trigonotarbida). Palaeontology. 2011;54(1):145–61.

Google Scholar
Garwood RJ, Sutton MD. X-ray micro-tomography of Carboniferous stalk-Dictyoptera: new insights into early insects. Biol Lett. 2010;6:699–702.

Google Scholar
Garwood RJ, Dunlop JA, Sutton MD. Loftier-fidelity 10-ray micro-tomography reconstruction of siderite-hosted Carboniferous arachnids. Biol Lett. 2009;v:841–4.

Google Scholar
Giribet G, Vogt L, González AP, Abel PG, Prashant S, Kury AB. A multilocus arroyo to harvestman (Arachnida: Opiliones) phylogeny with accent on biogeography and the systematics of Laniatores. Cladistics. 2010;26(four):408–37.

Google Scholar
Gould SJ. The structure of evolutionary theory. Cambridge: Belknap; 2002.

Google Scholar
Gould SJ, Eldredge N. Punctuated equilibria: the tempo and fashion of evolution reconsidered. Paleobiology. 1977;3(2):115–51.

Google Scholar
Gradstein FM, Ogg JG, Smith AG. International stratigraphic nautical chart. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2009.

Google Scholar
Grimaldi DA. 400 million years on half-dozen legs: on the origin and early evolution of Hexapoda. Arthropod Struct Dev. 2010;39:191–203.

Google Scholar
Grimaldi DA, Engel MS. Development of the insects. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2005.

Google Scholar
Gullan PJ, Cranston PS. The insects: an outline of entomology—fourth edition. Oxford: Blackwell; 2010.

Google Scholar
Hadley NF. Adaptational biology of desert scorpions. J Arachnol. 1974;2:11–23.

Google Scholar
Hadley NF. The arthropod cuticle. Sci Am. 1986;255:104–12.

Google Scholar
Hadley NF. H2o relations of terrestrial arthropods. London: Academic; 1994.

Google Scholar
Hartwell M. The Showtime Industrial Revolution. The American Economical Review, vol. 57. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1967.

Google Scholar
Haupt J. Phylogenetic aspects of recent studies on myriapod sense organs. In: Camatini One thousand, editor. Myriapod biology. London: Academic; 1979. p. 391–406.

Google Scholar
Higashi Thousand, Abe T, Burns TP. Carbon–nitrogen balance and termite environmental. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B: Biol Sci. 1992;249(1326):303–eight.

Google Scholar
Hopkin SP, Read HJ. The biological science of millipedes. Oxford: Oxford Academy Printing; 1992.

Google Scholar
Inward D, Beccaloni Chiliad, Eggleton P. Death of an social club: a comprehensive molecular phylogenetic study confirms that termites are eusocial cockroaches. Biol Lett. 2007;3:331–five.

CAS Google Scholar
Jenner RA. Higher-level crustacean phylogeny: consensus and conflicting hypotheses. Arthropod Struct Dev. 2010;39:143–53.

Google Scholar
Jeram AJ. Scorpions from the Viséan of East Kirkton, West Lothian, Scotland, with a revision of the infraorder Mesoscorpionina. Trans Imperial Soc Edinburgh, Earth Sci. 1994a;84:283–99.

Google Scholar
Jeram AJ. Carboniferous Orthosterni and their relationship to living scorpions. Palaeontology. 1994b;37(3):513–fifty.

Google Scholar
Jeram AJ, Selden PA, Edwards D. State animals in the Silurian: Arachnids and myriapods from Shropshire, England. Science. 1990;250:658–61.

CAS Google Scholar
Johnson EW, Briggs DEG, Suthren RJ, Wright JL, Tunnicliff SP. Non-marine arthropod traces from the subaerial Ordovician Borrowdale volcanic group, English language Lake District. Geol Magazine. 1994;131(three):395–406.

Google Scholar
Kamenz C, Dunlop JA, Scholtz G, Kerp H, Hass H. Microanatomy of Early Devonian book lungs. Biol Lett. 2008;four:212–v.

Google Scholar
Kenrick P, Crane PR. The origin and early evolution of plants on land. Nature. 1997;389:33–nine.

CAS Google Scholar
Klass KD, Kristensen NP. The basis plan and affinities of hexapods: contempo progress and open problems. Annales de la Société Entomologique de France. 2001;37(1–ii):265–98.

Google Scholar
Krapf D. Verhaltensphysiologishe Untersuchungen zum Beutefang von Skorpionen mit besonderer Berücksichtigung der Trichobothrien. PhD thesis, University of Würzburg; 1986.
Labandeira CC, Beall BS. Arthropod terrestriality. In: Culver SJ, editor. Arthropod palaeobiology. Short Courses in Palaeontology Number Iii. Knoxville: Palaeontological Society; 1990. p. 214–32.

Google Scholar
Legg DA, Garwood RJ, Dunlop JA, and Sutton Dr.. A taxonomic revision of Orthosternous scorpions from the English language Coal-Measures aided by Ten-ray micro-tomography. Palaeontologia Electronica; 2011 (in press).
Levi HW. Adapations of respiratory systems of spiders. Evolution. 1967;21(3):571–83.

Google Scholar
Lewis JGE. The biology of centipedes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Printing; 2007.

Google Scholar
Little C. The colonisation of land: origins and adaptations of terrestrial animals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1983.

Google Scholar
Lourenço WR, Gall JC. Fossil scorpions from the Buntsandstein (Early Triassic) of French republic. Comptes Rendus Palevol. 2004;three(5):369–78.

Google Scholar
Machado Chiliad, Pinto-da-Rocha R, Giribet Thou. What are harvestmen? In: Pinto-da-Rocha R, Machado M, Giribet G, editors. Harvestmen: the biology of Opiliones. Cambridge: Harvard University Printing; 2007. p. i–13.

Google Scholar
Meßlinger K. Fine construction of scorpion trichobothria (Arachnida, Scorpiones). Zoomorphology. 1987;107(1):49–57.

Google Scholar
Modesto SP, Hirst S, Reisz RR. Arthropod remains in the oral cavities of fossil reptiles support inference of early on insectivory. Biol Lett. 2009;5:838–twoscore.

Google Scholar
Nelson CE. On the persistence of unicorns: the trade-off between content and critical thinking revisited. In: Pescosolido BA, Aminzade R, editors. The social worlds of higher education: handbook for teaching in a new century. Thousand Oaks: Pine Forge Press; 1999. p. 168–84.

Google Scholar
Norton RA, Bonamo PM, Grierson JD, Shear WA. Oribatid mite fossils from a terrestrial Devonian eolith about Gilboa, New York. J Paleontol. 1988;62(2):259–69.

Google Scholar
Pennock RT. God of the gaps: the argument from ignorance and the limits of methodological naturalism. In: Petto AJ, Godfrey LR, editors. Scientists confront intelligent design and creationism. New York: West.Westward. Norton; 2007. p. 309–38.

Google Scholar
Plotnick RE, Kenig F, Scott Air conditioning, Glasspool IJ, Eble CF, Lang WJ. Pennsylvanian paleokarst and cave fills from northern Illinois, USA: a window into Late Carboniferous environments and landscapes. PALAIOS. 2009;24(x):627–37.

Google Scholar
Polis GA. The biology of scorpions. Palo Alto: Stanford Academy Press; 1990.

Google Scholar
Prave AR. Life on land in the Proterozoic: evidence from the Torridonian rocks of northwest Scotland. Geology. 2002;30:811–iv.

Google Scholar
Rasmussen B, Blake TS, Fletcher IR, Kilburn MR. Evidence for microbial life in synsedimentary cavities from two.75 Ga terrestrial environments. Geology. 2009;37(five):423–6.

Google Scholar
Raven JA. Comparative physiology of found and arthropod country accommodation. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser B: Biol Sci. 1985;309(1138):273–88.

Google Scholar
Reissland A, Görner P. Trichobothria. In: Barth FG, editor. Neurobiology of arachnids. Berlin: Springer; 1985. p. 138–61.

Google Scholar
Retallack GJ. Scoyenia burrows from Ordovician palaeosols of the Juniata Formation in Pennsylvania. Palaeontology. 2001;44(2):209–35.

Google Scholar
Retallack GJ, Feakes C. Trace fossil show for Tardily Ordovician animals on state. Science. 1987;235:61–3.

CAS Google Scholar
Rice CM, Ashcroft WA, Crossbar DJ, Boyce AJ, Caulfield JBD, Fallick AE, et al. A Devonian auriferous hot spring system, Rhynie, Scotland. J Geol Soc Lond. 1995;152(ii):229–50.

CAS Google Scholar
Roberts MBV. Biology: a functional arroyo—fourth Edition. Cheltenham: Nelson Thornes; 1986.

Google Scholar
Rößler R, Dunlop JA, Schneider JW. A redescription of some poorly known Rotliegend arachnids from the Lower Permian (Asselian) of the Ilfeld and Thuringian Woods Basins, Germany. Paläontologische Zeitschrift. 2003;77(two):417–27.

Google Scholar
Ruppert EE, Smith PR. The functional organization of filtration nephridia. Biol Rev. 1988;63(2):231–58.

Google Scholar
Ruppert EE, Pull a fast one on R, Barnes RD. Invertebrate zoology: a functional evolutionary arroyo—seventh edition. Pacific Grove: Brooks/Cole; 2003.

Google Scholar
Sahney S, Benton MJ. Recovery from the most profound mass extinction of all time. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B: Biol Sci. 2008;275:759–65.

Google Scholar
Schawaller Due west, Shear WA, Bonamo PM. The first Paleozoic pseudoscorpions (Arachnida, Pseudoscorpionida). Am Mus Novit. 1991;3009:1–17.

Google Scholar
Schmitz A, Perry SF. Bimodal breathing in jumping spiders: morphometric sectionalization of the lungs and tracheae in Salticus scenicus (Arachnida, Araneae, Salticidae). J Exp Biol. 2001;204(24):4321–34.

CAS Google Scholar
Scholtz G, Kamenz C. The book lungs of Scorpiones and Tetrapulmonata (Chelicerata, Arachnida): evidence for homology and a single terrestrialisation effect of a common arachnid ancestor. Zoology. 2006;109:2–xiii.

Google Scholar
Scott EC. Evolution vs. creationism: an introduction—second edition. Westport: Greenwood Press; 2009.

Google Scholar
Selden PA, Edwards D. Colonisation of the state. In: Allen KC, Briggs DEG, editors. Evolution and the fossil record. London: Belhaven Press; 1990. p. 122–52.

Google Scholar
Selden PA, Jeram AJ. Palaeophysiology of terrestrialisation in the Chelicerata. Trans Royal Soc Edinburgh, Earth Sci. 1989;fourscore:303–10.

Google Scholar
Selden PA, Shear WA, Bonamo PM. A spider and other arachnids from the Devonian of New York, and reinterpretations of Devonian Araneae. Palaeontology. 1991;34(two):241–81.

Google Scholar
Shear WA. Gigantocharinus szatmaryi, a new trigonotarbid arachnid from the Late Devonian of Due north America (Chelicerata: Arachnida: Trigonotarbida). J Paleontol. 2000a;74(1):25–31.

Google Scholar
Shear WA. The early development of terrestrial ecosystems. Nature. 2000b;351:283–9.

Google Scholar
Shear WA, Bonamo PM. Devonobiomorpha, a new order of centipeds (Chilopoda) from the Middle Devonian of Gilboa, New York State, U.s., and the phylogeny of centiped orders. Am Mus Novit. 1988;2927:ane–30.

Google Scholar
Shear WA, Edgecombe GD. The geological record and phylogeny of the Myriapoda. Arthropod Struct Dev. 2010;39:174–90.

Google Scholar
Shear WA, Kukalová-Peck J. The ecology of Paleozoic terrestrial arthropods: the fossil evidence. Can J Zool. 1990;68(9):1807–34.

Google Scholar
Shear WA, Selden PA. Rustling in the undergrowth: animals in early terrestrial ecosystems. In: Gensel PG, Edwards D, editors. Plants invade the country: evolutionary and environmental perspectives. New York: Columbia Academy Press; 2001. p. 29–51.

Google Scholar
Shear WA, Bonamo PM, Grierson JD, Rolfe WDI, Smith EL, Norton RA. Early land animals in Northward America: Prove from Devonian age arthropods from Gilboa, New York. Science 1984;224(4648):492–4.

CAS Google Scholar
Shear WA, Selden PA, Rolfe WDI, Bonamo PM, Grierson JD. New terrestrial arachnids from the Devonian of Gilboa, New York (Arachnida: Trigonotarbida). Am Mus Novit. 1987;2901:1–74.

Google Scholar
Shear WA, Gensel PG, Jeram AJ. Fossils of large terrestrial arthropods from the Lower Devonian of Canada. Nature. 1996;384:555–87.

CAS Google Scholar
Shear WA, Jeram AJ, Selden PA. Centiped legs (Arthropoda, Chilopoda, Scutigeromorpha) from the Silurian and Devonian of Britain and the Devonian of North America. Am Mus Novit. 1998;3231:one–16.

Google Scholar
Sheldon P. Plus ça change—a model for stasis and development in different environments. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol. 1996;127:209–27.

Google Scholar
Shultz JW, Regier JC. Phylogenetic assay of arthropods using ii nuclear protein-encoding genes supports a crustacean/hexapod clade. Proc R Soc Lond Series B: Biol Sci. 2000;267:1011–9.

CAS Google Scholar
Skelton P. Evolution: a biological and palaeontological approach. New Jersey: Prentice Hall; 1993.

Google Scholar
Snodgrass RE. Evolution of the Annelida: Onychophora and Arthropoda. Smithson Misc Collect. 1938;97(half-dozen):1–159.

Google Scholar
Størmer Fifty. Arthropods from the Lower Devonian (Lower Emsian) of Alken an der Mosel, Federal republic of germany. Part ane: Arachnida. Senckenbergiana Lethaea. 1970;51:335–69.

Google Scholar
Størmer L. Arthropods from the Lower Devonian (Lower Emsian) of Alken an der Mosel, Germany. Function 2: Xiphosura. Senckenbergiana Lethaea. 1972;53:1–29.

Google Scholar
Størmer L. Arthropods from the Lower Devonian (Lower Emsian) of Alken an der Mosel, Frg. Part 3: Eurypterida, Hughmilleriidae. Senckenbergiana Lethaea. 1973;54:119–205.

Google Scholar
Størmer L. Arthropods from the Lower Devonian (Lower Emsian) of Alken an der Mosel, Germany. Part 4: Eurypterida, Drepanopteridae, and other groups. Senckenbergiana Lethaea. 1974;54:359–451.

Google Scholar
Størmer L. Arthropods from the Lower Devonian (Lower Emsian) of Alken an der Mosel, Frg. Part five. Myriapods and additional forms, with general remarks on the animal and problems regarding invasion of country by arthropods. Senckenbergiana Lethaea. 1976;57:87–183.

Google Scholar
Størmer L. Gigantoscorpio willsi, a new scorpion from the Lower Carboniferous of Scotland and its associated preying microorganisms. Skrifter Utgitt av Det Norske Videnskaps–Akademi I Oslo I. Mathematisk-Naturvidenskabelig Klasse 1963; 8:i–171.

Google Scholar
Strother PK, Battison L, Brasier MD, Wellman CH. Globe's earliest non-marine eukaryotes. Nature. 2011;473:505–ix.

CAS Google Scholar
Trewin NH, Fayers SR. A new crustacean from the Early on Devonian Rhynie Chert, Aberdeenshire, Scotland. Trans Purple Soc Edinburgh, Earth Sci. 2007;93(4):355–82.

Google Scholar
Trewin NH, Fayers SR, Kelman R. Subaqueous silicification of the contents of modest ponds in an Early on Devonian hot-spring complex, Rhynie, Scotland. Can J Globe Sci. 2003;40(11):1697–712.

Google Scholar
Vogel BR, Durden CJ. The occurrence of stigmata in a Carboniferous scorpion. J Paleontol. 1966;forty(3):655–eight.

Google Scholar
Wellman CH, Gray J. The microfossil record of early on land plants. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Series B: Biol Sci. 2000;355(1398):717–31.

CAS Google Scholar
Wellman CH, Kerp H, Hass H. Spores of the Rhynie chert plant Aglaophyton (Rhynia) major (Kidston and Lang) D.S. Edwards, 1986. Rev Palaeobot Palynol. 2006;142(3–4):229–50.

Google Scholar
Weygoldt P. Fighting, courtship, and spermatophore morphology of the whip spider Musicodamon atlanteus Fage, 1939 (Phrynichidae) (Chelicerata, Amblypygi). Zoologischer Anzeiger. 2002;241(iii):245–54.

Google Scholar
Whitford WG. Keystone arthropods as webmasters in desert ecosystems. In: Coleman DC, Hendrix PF, editors. Invertebrates equally webmasters in ecosystems. Wallingford: CABI; 2000. p. 25–41.

Google Scholar
Wilson HM. Juliformian millipedes from the Lower Devonian of Euramerica: implications for the timing of millipede cladogenesis in the Paleozoic. J Paleontol. 2006;80:638–49.

Google Scholar
Wilson HM, Anderson LI. Morphology and taxonomy of Paleozoic millipedes (Diplopoda:Chilognatha: Archipolypoda) from Scotland. J Paleontol. 2004;78(1):169–84.

Google Scholar

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Department of Palaeontology, The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London, SW7 5BD, UK

Russell J. Garwood & Gregory D. Edgecombe

Respective author

Correspondence to Russell J. Garwood.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This is an open up access commodity distributed nether the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0 ), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(southward) and source are credited.

Reprints and Permissions

Well-nigh this article

Cite this article

Garwood, R.J., Edgecombe, M.D. Early on Terrestrial Animals, Evolution, and Uncertainty. Evo Edu Outreach 4, 489–501 (2011). https://doi.org/ten.1007/s12052-011-0357-y

Download citation

Published: 24 August 2011
Upshot Engagement: September 2011
DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s12052-011-0357-y

Keywords

Terrestrialisation
Evolution
Arthropods
Palaeozoic ecosystems

Source: https://evolution-outreach.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1007/s12052-011-0357-y

Posted by: lockhartthereenewhe.blogspot.com